TIME WARNER CABLE ROBOCALLS WOMAN 153 TIMES

[TECHNOLOGY ★★]

TIME WARNER CABLE ROBOCALLS WOMAN 153 TIMES

The Federal Trade Commission will award $50,000 to an individual or small company that comes up with the best solution for blocking illegal robocalls.

(P1) What’s more annoying? Your cable company or ROBOCALLS?

(P2) Of course that’s an UNFAIR question. Nothing good every came out of a robocall.

(P3) Yet so many companies think there’s a certain GLORY in getting a computer to BOMBARD you with phone calls, with the idea that you’ll listen in the end.

(P4) This might cost Time Warner Cable some money. For it robocalled Araceli King 153 times in less than a year. She got so annoyed she wanted to learn what a Manhattan federal judge might think. The judge agreed that this was annoying and ordered the cable company to pay $229,500.

(P5) King, from Irving, Texas, was doubly annoyed as the calls weren’t even meant for her. They were made to annoy — I’m sorry, I meant encourage — a man called Luis Perez to pay his bills. He had King’s number before it was TRANSFERRED to her.

(P6) She told the court that she’d called Time Warner Cable — which is being bought by Charter Communications — and politely explained to a human that she was not Luis Perez. However, the calls continued.

(P7) TWC offered that it was being PERFECTLY REASONABLE because its machines believed they were calling Perez, someone who had CONSENTED to the calls.

(P8) The judge, however, suggested that “a RESPONSIBLE business” should be a little more, well, responsible with its telephonic BADGERING.

(P9) He felt moved to point out that after King sued TWC in March 2014, the company still robocalled her 74 times. This seems A TOUCH careless.

(P10) The judge made his calculation by taking $1,500 for every call made. This REPRESENTS triple damages. It seems the judge believed that King’s double annoyance was actually triple annoyance.

(P11) A court date had been set for July 27. However, a Time Warner Cable spokeswoman told me: “We are reviewing the ruling and our options to DETERMINE how we are going to PROCEED.”

(P12) For every executive of every company faced with what seems like a clear failure to BEHAVE DECENTLY, one question to ask might be: How would I feel if this had happened to me?

(P13) I have a NOTION that some would feel they were at least $230,000 worth of annoyed.

WORDS: 382

SOURCE: http://www.cnet.com/news/time-warner-cable-to-pay-230000-after-robocalling-woman-153-times/

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS:

If you found the passage difficult to read or had problems understanding specific words or idiomatic expressions, please discuss them with your tutor. The following discussion questions should be answered in your own words and with your own arguments.

  1. Briefly summarize the content of the article in your own words.
  2. Have you ever received a robocall?
  3. Are you satisfied with the service provided by your cable company? What services do you receive from them – television, Internet, telephone?
  4. What are some common situations in which you feel that your time is wasted?
  5. Have you had good or bad experiences when you make calls to companies’ customer service lines?

EXPRESSIONS TO PRACTICE:

What do the following expressions mean? Practice using each expression in a sentence; extra points if you can use it in conversation.

  • A touch

PRACTICE ARTICLE NOW

One thought on “TIME WARNER CABLE ROBOCALLS WOMAN 153 TIMES

  1. Pingback: WEEK 45 | Cambly's Curated Articles

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s