UGANDA USED SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY TO CRUSH OPPOSITION

[TECHNOLOGY ★★]

UGANDA USED SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY TO CRUSH OPPOSITION

Uganda President

(P1) The government of Uganda used SOPHISTICATED SURVEILLANCE technology to target opposition members, journalists, and activists, according to an INVESTIGATION from the London-based WATCHDOG Privacy International. The report, based on secret government documents, shows how Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni personally SPEARHEADED a CAMPAIGN to spy on and VANQUISH OPPOSITION MOVEMENTS following the 2011 presidential election.

(P2) The government’s weapon OF CHOICE was a highly INVASIVE form of spyware called FinFisher, produced by Gamma Group International, a UK-based company with AFFILIATES in various other countries. FinFisher is capable of remotely monitoring computers, smartphones, and other equipment in real time, and has been sold ON THE OPEN MARKET to REPRESSIVE governments.

(P3) The Ugandan government purchased FinFisher in 2012, documents show, after Museveni launched Operation Fungua Macho (“open your eyes”). The INITIATIVE involved 70 INTELLIGENCE officials, and was launched in response to WIDESPREAD political UNREST that ERUPTED over ALLEGED corruption, police BRUTALITY, and high living costs following the 2011 election. More than 600 people were arrested or DETAINED, including members of PARLIAMENT.

(P4) FinFisher was the “BACKBONE” of the operation, Privacy International reports, which aimed to BLACKMAIL opposition members and “crush… CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE.” FinFisher “access points” were installed in Uganda’s parliament and other government institutions, and Museveni’s opponents were targeted in their homes, as well. Gamma trained four Ugandan officials on how to use FinFisher in late 2011, after a second wave of protests erupted.

(P5) “The documents say that the surveillance industry will sell to just about anyone,” Gus Hosein, executive director of Privacy International, tells the BBC. “And it is proof of the fact that we have been trying to raise all along — that these technologies are far too powerful to be in the hands of governments and that governments will go ahead and abuse them.”

(P6) There’s cause for concern GOING FORWARD, as well. According to Privacy International, Uganda is close to acquiring a centralized communications monitoring center ahead of next year’s presidential election.

(P7) In a letter to Privacy International, a government spokesperson denied that the surveillance program exists. “President Museveni does not use criminal blackmail as a political tool to win over or deal with opponents,” the spokesperson said, “it does not add any value as (the) government enjoys broad political LEGITIMACY and support.”

(P8) Government spokesman Colonel Shaban Bantariza tells the BBC that there is “no evidence” that any opponents have been monitored.

(P9) In a statement to the BBC, Gamma said its products are designed to combat “terrorist threats, drug cartels, other major organized crime, and PEDOPHILE rings.” “Gamma makes an absolute OBLIGATION of confidentiality to the governments which purchase its products and systems,” the company said. “Gamma does not assist or encourage any government agency in the misuse of Gamma’s products and systems.”

WORDS: 457

SOURCE: http://www.theverge.com/2015/10/16/9549151/uganda-finfisher-surveillance-spyware-privacy-international

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS:

If you found the passage difficult to read or had problems understanding specific words or idiomatic expressions, please discuss them with your tutor. The following discussion questions should be answered in your own words and with your own arguments.

  1. Briefly summarize the content of the article in your own words.
  2. Would you agree with the idea that any way a technology can be abused, it will be abused?
  3. Governments often make DENIALS of various activities. Do people believe those denials?
  4. Do you think that Gamma Group International has any moral QUALMS about selling its technology to repressive governments?
  5. Do you believe that politics is becoming more dangerous in many countries?

EXPRESSIONS TO PRACTICE:

What do the following expressions mean? Practice using each expression in a sentence; extra points if you can use it in conversation.

  • Opposition movement
  • Of choice
  • On the open market
  • Civil disobedience
  • Going forward

Cambly Practice Button

One thought on “UGANDA USED SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY TO CRUSH OPPOSITION

  1. Pingback: WEEK 59 | Cambly's Curated Articles

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s