APPLE REFUSES TO UNLOCK IPHONE IN TERRORISM CASE
(P1) Apple is opposing a court order to unlock the iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino shooters, accusing the federal government of an “OVERREACH” that could potentially invade the privacy of millions of customers.
(P2) CEO Tim Cook published an open letter late Tuesday, promising to fight a judge’s ruling that it should give FBI investigators access to ENCRYPTED data on the device.
(P3) “The government is asking Apple to hack our ownusers and UNDERMINE decades of security advancements that protect our customers — including tens of millions of American citizens — from hackers and cybercriminals,” Cook wrote.
(P4) The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles argued the FBI needed Apple to help it find the password and access “relevant, critical … data” on the locked cellphone of Syed Farook, who with his wife Tashfeen Malik murdered 14 people in San Bernardino, California, on Dec. 2.
(P6) “Opposing this order is not something we TAKE LIGHTLY. We feel we must speak up in the face of what we see as an overreach by the U.S. government,” Cook wrote in the open letter to customers.
(P7) “We are challenging the FBI’s demands with the deepest respect for American democracy and a love of our country. We believe it would be in the best interest of everyone to step back and consider the IMPLICATIONS.”
(P8) He said the request would “undermine the very freedoms and liberty our government is meant to protect.”
(P9) Alex Abdo, an American Civil Liberties Union staff attorney, called it an “UNPRECEDENTED, unwise, and unlawful move” by the government.
(P10) “The Constitution does not permit the government to force companies to hack into their customers’ devices. Apple is free to offer a phone that stores information securely, and it must remain so if consumers are to retain any control over their private data,” Abdo said.
(P11) “If the FBI can force Apple to hack into its customers’ devices, then so too can every REPRESSIVE REGIME in the rest of the world,” he added. “Apple deserves praise for STANDING UP FOR its right to offer secure devices to all of its customers.”
(P12) Cook insisted Apple had “worked hard to support the government’s efforts to solve this horrible crime,” but said the government had “asked us to build a backdoor to the iPhone” — something he described as “too dangerous to create.”
(P13) He said the suggestion that a tool to hack the iPhone could only be used once was “simply not true.”
(P14) “Once created, the method could be used over and over again, on any number of devices,” Cook said. “It would be the EQUIVALENT of a master key, capable of opening hundreds of millions of locks — from restaurants and banks to stores and homes. No reasonable person would find that acceptable.”
(P16) “We can find no PRECEDENT for an American company being forced to expose its customers to a greater risk of attack,” he wrote. “The implications of the government’s demands are CHILLING. While we believe the FBI’s intentions are good, it would be wrong for the government to force us to build a backdoor into our products.”
If you found the passage difficult to read or had problems understanding specific words or idiomatic expressions, please discuss them with your tutor. The following discussion questions should be answered in your own words and with your own arguments.
- Briefly summarize the content of the article in your own words.
- Do you own any Apple devices? What is your experience with them?
- Has your private electronic data ever been hacked?
- Do CITIZENS have to GIVE UP some of their privacy to fight terrorism, or is privacy too important?
- Have there been any terrorist incidents in your country recently?
EXPRESSIONS TO PRACTICE:
What do the following expressions mean? Practice using each expression in a sentence; extra points if you can use it in conversation.
- Take lightly
- Stand up for
- Give up